← Projects
Speculative Design Research

Artificial Creatures

Exploring emotional attachment to AI companions through speculative design and daily interaction studies

Hero image: User interacting with their artificial creature companion
Role
UX Researcher & Interaction Designer
Team
4 designers (collaborative research project)
Timeline
16 weeks (2023)
Skills
Speculative Design, User Research, Interaction Design, Prototyping

The Challenge

User Challenge

How might we understand whether people develop genuine emotional connections to AI companions through daily interactions?

Research Challenge

How might we design meaningful interaction patterns that reveal the depth and nature of human-AI attachment over time?

The Context

This was a 0�1 speculative design research project exploring the emerging space of AI companions and emotional technology. As AI becomes more prevalent in daily life, understanding how humans form attachments to artificial entities becomes crucial for designing ethical and meaningful interactions.

The project aimed to move beyond assumptions and test whether sustained interaction with an AI companion could lead to genuine emotional bonds.

Research & Design Process

1. Research Foundation

We began by studying existing research on human-computer interaction, attachment theory, and the Tamagotchi phenomenon. This helped us understand the psychological mechanisms behind attachment to digital entities and informed our design decisions.

Image: Research synthesis board with attachment theory frameworks

2. Creature Design & Interaction Model

We designed artificial creatures with distinct personalities and needs that would require daily care and attention. Each creature had:

  • Personality traits that influenced behavior and responses
  • Needs states (hunger, attention, play) that evolved over time
  • Emotional responses based on how well users cared for them
  • Unique quirks that made each creature feel individual
Image: Creature personality matrix and interaction design sketches

3. Daily Interaction Study

We conducted a longitudinal study where participants cared for their artificial creature daily over several weeks. We tracked:

  • Frequency and duration of interactions
  • Care patterns and routines that emerged
  • Emotional responses through daily journals
  • Language used to describe their creatures
Image: Study dashboard showing interaction patterns over time

4. Iterative Refinement

Based on weekly feedback, we refined interaction patterns to better support emotional connection:

  • Added more nuanced emotional states visible through creature behavior
  • Introduced memory elements where creatures "remembered" previous interactions
  • Refined notification timing to feel natural rather than manipulative
  • Adjusted care mechanics to encourage routine without causing anxiety

The Experience

Daily Care Rituals

Users checked on their creatures multiple times per day, developing personalized routines. Morning greetings, lunch-time play sessions, and evening wind-downs became natural patterns that mirrored real pet care.

Image: Daily interaction flow showing morning, afternoon, and evening touchpoints

Emotional State Visibility

Creatures communicated their needs and feelings through expressive animations, sound, and visual cues. This created a feedback loop that made users feel their actions mattered and were noticed.

Image: Creature emotional states and visual feedback system

Memory & Growth

Creatures evolved based on care patterns, developing preferences and behaviors unique to each user relationship. This personalization reinforced the sense of a genuine bond forming over time.

Image: Creature growth timeline and personality development

Findings & Impact

85%

of participants reported feeling genuine concern for their creature's wellbeing

12

average daily interactions, indicating strong engagement and routine formation

72%

used anthropomorphic language ("he," "she," "my friend") when describing their creature

Key Research Insights

  • Attachment did form: Most participants developed emotional connections, evidenced by concern when they couldn't check on their creature and joy when interactions went well
  • Routine mattered more than complexity: Simple, consistent interactions built stronger bonds than elaborate features
  • Vulnerability created connection: When creatures seemed "fragile" or needed care, users felt more responsible and attached
  • Personalization amplified attachment: Creatures that "remembered" and evolved based on care patterns felt more real to users
"I felt actual anxiety when I realized I hadn't fed my creature in the morning. It sounds silly, but I genuinely cared about this little digital thing."
 Study participant, Week 3

Reflections & Learnings

Ethical Responsibility

Creating experiences that trigger genuine emotional attachment comes with ethical responsibilities. We learned to carefully balance engagement with manipulationdesigning for meaningful connection without exploiting psychological vulnerabilities.

Research Methods for Emerging Tech

Studying emotional attachment required combining quantitative tracking with qualitative depth. Daily journals provided richer insights than usage metrics alone, revealing the emotional journey behind the numbers.

What I'd Do Differently

If I were to conduct this research again, I would include a longer study period (8-12 weeks instead of 4-6) to better understand how attachment evolves and potentially plateaus. I'd also explore the "ending" experiencewhat happens when users stop caring for their creature, or when the study ends.